🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? You should be. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical entrepreneur. Neither the average worker. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in healthcare.

The Healthcare System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Costly

According to a recent study, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (increasing by 6% from last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand for each worker by 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning because political disagreements over tax credits which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way medical professionals get paid would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Would Work

A national health insurance program would require payments from employees and employers. In similar programs, an employee earning average wages must contribute about five point three percent to their healthcare. The company pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem expensive? Not if you contrast it to what the typical US resident spends. I can name dozens of clients who are easily contributing between 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that with comprehensive systems, these contributions include pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection in addition to funding medical services. When including these expenses compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Implementation for America

In the US, a national health premium would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a system that is already in place. It should be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to much of federal military, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the system could be managed by private contractors instead of federal agencies.

Advantages for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program would be a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would place us on a level playing field with our larger competitors that can pay for better plans. It would make management significantly simpler (a payroll deduction processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, rather than individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would make simpler for us to budget annual expenditures, rather than going through the complex (and fruitless) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers required annually each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension of coverage among workers – as opposed to existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complications of existing plans. And there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for companies as we no longer have access to workers' health histories for purposes of weighing risks and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in society, including national security to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system enhances our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, simpler approach for entrepreneurs that employ more than half of American employees and generate half of our GDP. It enables for workers to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act is not working effectively. I understand that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes required, would still be a better and more affordable strategy both for managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, we need to reduce our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't so great. The US places significantly behind many other countries in healthcare quality in the world, based on major studies. Perhaps a bright spot amid present circumstances is that we take serious examination in the mirror and agree that big changes are necessary.